What we are witnessing is not a series of isolated protests or organic social movements. This is a coordinated, foreign-funded operation to fundamentally transform American institutions through a network of over 2,500 organizations representing more than 700 million people globally.
The evidence reveals a sophisticated influence operation that:
Uses American tax-exempt organizations as conduits for foreign influence
Employs communist revolutionary tactics adapted for the digital age
Receives funding from America's primary adversaries (China, Russia, Iran)
Operates through layers of legitimacy-laundering that provide plausible deniability
Targets the same institutional pillars that communists have historically sought to control
PART I: THE ARCHITECTURE OF SUBVERSION
The Numbers Tell the Story
2,500-3,000+ organizations in coordinated network
1,504 organizations signed single letter in ONE WEEK (January 2024)
400+ campus organizations under centralized control
100+ labor unions integrated into network
150+ religious organizations providing moral cover
100+ legal organizations conducting lawfare
This level of coordination is impossible without massive infrastructure and funding.
The Hub-and-Spoke Model
At the center: The International People's Assembly (IPA)
Founded 2017 by Brazil's Landless Workers' Movement (MST)
200+ member organizations across 6 continents
Claims to represent 700+ million people
Coordinates with World Federation of Trade Unions (historically Soviet-controlled)
Funded by Neville Roy Singham ($400M+ fortune)
Singham's Background:
American millionaire, renounced US citizenship
Moved operations to Shanghai
"Code Pink" co-founder Jodie Evans is his partner
Owns BreakThrough News (pro-China propaganda outlet)
Funds Tricontinental Institute (Marxist think tank)
Purchased $27M building in Manhattan for "The People's Forum"
The People's Forum in NYC serves as:
Physical headquarters for coordination
Training center for activists
Event space for coalition-building
Office space for affiliated organizations
This is textbook communist cell structure: Central coordination hub with satellite organizations providing plausible deniability.
PART II: COMPARING HISTORICAL COMMUNIST REVOLUTION TO CURRENT OPERATIONS
Classic Communist Revolution Strategy (Lenin/Mao Model):
Infiltrate and control key institutions: Labor unions
Universities
Media
Religious organizations
Legal systems
Create united front organizations: Broad coalitions masking communist control
"Useful idiots" providing legitimacy
Multiple layers between party and action
Employ agitation and propaganda: Identify societal grievances
Amplify through coordinated messaging
Frame as systemic problems requiring revolution
Conduct "lawfare" and institutional capture: Use legal systems against themselves
Force institutions into defensive positions
Create parallel power structures
Coordinate with foreign communist powers: Receive funding and direction
Synchronize with geopolitical objectives
Maintain international solidarity networks
Current Operation (2017-2025):
1. INSTITUTIONAL INFILTRATION ✓
Labor Unions:
Amazon Labor Union (ICSGP signatory)
Tunisian General Labor Union (ICSGP signatory)
100+ unions in ICSGP coalition
Palestinian General Federation of Trade Unions (ICSGP signatory, coordinates with World Federation of Trade Unions)
Universities:
275 Students for Justice in Palestine chapters (controlled by American Muslims for Palestine per 2024 lawsuit)
70-80 Jewish Voice for Peace chapters
Faculty for Justice in Palestine networks at Columbia, Harvard, MIT, UCLA, etc.
127 simultaneous campus encampments (Spring 2024)
3,000+ students arrested in coordinated actions
Media:
BreakThrough News (Singham-funded, 1.3M YouTube subscribers)
The Grayzone (pro-Russia/China outlet)
Tricontinental Institute (Marxist analysis distributed globally)
Synchronized messaging across 1,500+ organizations
Religious Institutions:
150+ religious organizations in ICSGP
Multiple mosque networks (100+ Islamic organizations)
Presbyterian, Lutheran, UCC churches
Jewish Voice for Peace (70-80 chapters providing Jewish legitimacy)
Legal System:
National Lawyers Guild (multiple chapters, ICSGP founder)
International Association of Democratic Lawyers (ICSGP founder)
Palestine Legal (defends activists)
Global Legal Alliance for Palestine (international lawfare coordination)
COMPARISON: This matches Lenin's strategy EXACTLY. The difference is scale and sophistication.
2. UNITED FRONT ORGANIZATIONS ✓
Historical Example: Communist Party USA created dozens of "front organizations" in the 1930s-50s to mask party control. Each organization appeared independent but received direction from CPUSA, which received direction from Moscow.
Current Example:
International Coalition to Stop Genocide in Palestine (ICSGP): 1,504 organizations Founded by: Black Alliance for Peace, CODEPINK, Progressive International, National Lawyers Guild
All founding organizations have IPA connections
Includes: Democratic Socialists of America, Communist Party USA, Communist Party of Australia, Workers' Party of Belgium
Also includes: Mainstream unions, churches, universities
Creates appearance of broad consensus while hiding communist coordination
The Layers:
Layer 1: Chinese/Russian state interests
Layer 2: Singham funding apparatus
Layer 3: IPA coordination network
Layer 4: "Coalition" organizations (ICSGP, SID4P)
Layer 5: Mainstream institutions (universities, unions, churches)
Layer 6: Individual activists (believe they're part of grassroots movement)
Each layer provides plausible deniability for the layer above.
COMPARISON: This is MORE sophisticated than historical communist fronts because of the additional layers and use of digital coordination.
3. AGITATION AND PROPAGANDA ✓
Historical Communist Strategy:
Identify genuine grievances (worker exploitation, racial injustice, war)
Frame as inherent to capitalism/imperialism
Offer communist revolution as only solution
Coordinate messaging through front organizations
Example of Amplification:
Identified grievance: Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Framing: "Genocide" requiring "anti-imperialist" resistance
Solution: Dismantling "Zionist project" as step toward dismantling Western power
Coordinated messaging: 1,504 organizations sign identical letter in ONE WEEK
The Language: From ICSGP materials:
"The South African Case at the World Court...provides colonized peoples around the world a unique opportunity...to shift the balance of global power away from the U.S. and toward the Global South."
This is not human rights language. This is geopolitical strategy.
The Messaging Synchronization:
October 7, 2023: Hamas attacks
January 3, 2024: ICSGP letter issued
January 8, 2024: 800+ signatures
January 26, 2024: 2,000+ signatures
Organizations across 100+ countries coordinated messaging in real-time. This requires:
Pre-existing communication infrastructure
Centralized direction
Significant funding
Professional coordination
COMPARISON: Soviet propaganda was centralized in Moscow and distributed through Communist International (Comintern). Current operation is distributed across multiple nodes (Shanghai, Havana, Johannesburg) but equally coordinated.
4. LAWFARE AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPTURE ✓
Historical Strategy:
Use legal system to defend communists
File strategic lawsuits to burden opposition
Create legal precedents favorable to revolution
Capture regulatory agencies and courts
Current Operation:
Legal Warfare:
South Africa ICJ case (genocide charge against Israel)
ICSGP mobilized 1,504 organizations to pressure governments
27 countries publicly supported case
Strategy: Use international law to delegitimize US ally, set precedent
Campus Institutional Capture:
127 encampments forced universities into negotiations
56 divestment resolutions passed
Universities created "Palestine Studies" programs
Administrators fired or resigned under pressure
Result: Institutions now partially controlled by activist demands
Corporate Pressure:
BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) campaigns
Targeted: Google, Amazon, Microsoft, universities' investment portfolios
Goal: Force economic disengagement from Israel
Broader objective: Demonstrate that coordinated pressure can force corporate compliance
COMPARISON: This exceeds historical communist lawfare because international law has more teeth than it did in the 1950s, and corporations are more vulnerable to reputational pressure.
5. COORDINATION WITH FOREIGN POWERS ✓
This is where the comparison becomes undeniable.
The Funding Trail
DOCUMENTED FUNDING (Pre-October 7, 2023):
To Alliance for Global Justice (AFGJ):
Open Society Foundation: $250,000
Tides Foundation: $286,000
Movement for Black Lives (2020-2021): $56.4 MILLION passed through AFGJ
AFGJ takes 7-8% commission on all donations
AFGJ fiscally sponsors 150 organizations including Samidoun
To Jewish Voice for Peace:
Rockefeller Brothers Fund: $490,000 (2019-2026)
Lannan Foundation: $500,000 (2023)
Kataly Foundation: $50,000 (2023)
To Singham Network:
Personal wealth: $400+ million
Funds: The People's Forum, BreakThrough News, Tricontinental, ALBA Movements
Based in Shanghai, China
Works with Chinese state media
WHAT HAPPENED AFTER OCTOBER 7:
New Venture Fund stopped funding AFGJ
AFGJ de-platformed from Stripe, PayPal, Discover, Salsa Labs
Treasury sanctioned Samidoun (AFGJ sponsee) October 2024
But operations continued and EXPANDED:ICSGP formed (1,504 organizations)
Campus encampments coordinated (127 simultaneously)
International legal campaign launched
Network grew to 2,500+ organizations
Question: Where is the money coming from NOW?
The Chinese Connection
Neville Roy Singham:
Renounced US citizenship
Relocated to Shanghai
BreakThrough News produces pro-China content: Defends Uyghur detention camps
Promotes Belt and Road Initiative
Attacks US "imperialism"
Aligns with Chinese foreign policy on every issue
The People's Forum:
$27 million building in Manhattan
Hosts pro-China events
Features Chinese government officials
Coordinating hub for IPA network
Functions as Beijing's soft power node in NYC
IPA Network Alignment:
Supports Venezuela (China's Latin American ally)
Supports Cuba (China's Caribbean ally)
Opposes US "imperialism" (China's narrative)
Promotes "Global South" unity (China's BRICS strategy)
Every position aligns with Chinese foreign policy
The Evidence: Chinese state media amplifies messages from:
BreakThrough News
CODEPINK
Black Alliance for Peace
The People's Forum
This is not coincidence. This is coordination.
The Russian Connection
The Grayzone:
Founded by Max Blumenthal (son of Clinton advisor Sidney Blumenthal)
Receives unknown funding
Promotes Russian talking points: Syria: Denies Assad war crimes
Ukraine: Blames NATO expansion
MH17: Denies Russian responsibility
Skripal poisoning: Denies Russian involvement
Alignment with Russian Interests:
ICSGP criticizes "US imperialism" (Russian narrative)
Organizations oppose NATO (Russian objective)
Network promotes "multipolar world" (Russian foreign policy goal)
The Pattern: Every major position taken by this network aligns with both Chinese and Russian foreign policy objectives:
Anti-US "imperialism"
Anti-NATO
Pro-Venezuela, Cuba, Syria, Iran
Oppose "rules-based international order"
Promote "Global South" against "Global North"
This alignment is not ideological. It is operational.
The Iranian Connection
Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network:
US Treasury designation (October 2024): "Sham charity providing material support to PFLP"
PFLP participated in October 7 attacks
PFLP is designated terrorist organization
Samidoun is AFGJ fiscal sponsee
Samidoun is ICSGP signatory (#1181)
Iranian State Support for PFLP:
Iran funds PFLP operations
Iran provides weapons to PFLP
Iran coordinates with PFLP in Gaza
Therefore: Samidoun connects to Iranian state interests
The Integration:
Samidoun (Iranian proxy)
→ AFGJ (fiscal sponsor)
→ ICSGP (1,504 organization coalition)
→ Includes mainstream US unions, universities, churches
Result: Iranian influence reaches American institutions through NGO laundering.
PART III: HOW THIS IS CHANGING AMERICA
The Institutional Transformation
What Has Already Changed:
1. UNIVERSITIES:
Before 2020:
Pro-Israel campus groups dominant
BDS seen as fringe
Jewish students felt safe
Academic freedom debates centered on conservative speakers
After 2023:
127 campus encampments (Spring 2024)
56 divestment resolutions passed
3,000+ students arrested
Jewish students report unsafe environments
Multiple university presidents resigned or fired
"Palestine Studies" programs created (activist training disguised as academics)
Campus discourse fundamentally shifted
The Method: SJP chapters (controlled by AMP) created untenable situations:
Occupied buildings
Blocked Jewish students from campus
Disrupted classes
Refused to negotiate
Forced administrators to choose: Meet demands or face chaos
Many administrators chose compliance.
Result: Universities are now partially controlled by activists aligned with foreign powers.
2. LABOR UNIONS:
The Amazon Labor Union:
Organized Staten Island warehouse (2022)
President: Chris Smalls
ICSGP signatory
Promotes anti-Israel positions
Coordinates with international labor movements controlled by communist parties
The Strategy:
Organize workers around legitimate grievances (low pay, poor conditions)
Once workers organized, introduce political demands
Link labor struggles to "anti-imperialist" causes
Coordinate with international communist labor federations
This is EXACTLY the CPUSA strategy from the 1930s-40s.
Result: American workers being organized into international communist labor networks.
3. RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS:
The Infiltration:
150+ religious organizations in ICSGP
Multiple denominations (Presbyterian, Lutheran, UCC, Unitarian)
100+ Islamic organizations
15+ JVP chapters (Jewish organizations)
The Method:
Frame Palestine as moral imperative (not political issue)
Use religious language ("justice," "liberation," "prophetic witness")
Pressure religious leaders through congregations
Create parallel "social justice" structures within denominations
The Result: Major denominations now take positions aligned with foreign adversaries while believing they're following religious principles.
Example: Presbyterian Church (USA) has:
Passed multiple divestment resolutions
Sent delegations to Gaza (coordinated by Palestinian groups)
Created "Israel/Palestine Mission Network"
Network is ICSGP signatory
Congregants think: "We're following Jesus's call to justice" Reality: Their denomination is coordinating with foreign influence networks
4. LEGAL SYSTEM:
The Transformation:
National Lawyers Guild:
Founded 1937 (as CPUSA legal arm)
Provided legal defense for communists during McCarthy era
Never disbanded, now has multiple state chapters
ICSGP founding organization
Provides legal defense for activists arrested at encampments
The Current Strategy:
Defend activists from prosecution
File strategic lawsuits (against universities, corporations)
Create legal precedents
Conduct international lawfare (ICJ case)
Overwhelm system with coordinated legal actions
The Result:
Activists receive professional legal defense
Organizations face expensive litigation
Universities settle rather than fight
Legal system becomes tool of revolution
5. MEDIA AND NARRATIVE CONTROL:
The Ecosystem:
Alternative Media:
BreakThrough News (1.3M YouTube subscribers)
The Grayzone
Tricontinental Institute
Popular Resistance
Synchronized messaging across platforms
Social Media:
TikTok (Chinese-controlled platform)
1,504 organizations amplifying same messages
Coordinated hashtag campaigns
Algorithm manipulation through volume
Mainstream Media:
Activists trained to talk to press
"Experts" from network organizations quoted
Narrative framing adopted by journalists
Overton window shifted
The Result:
Language that was fringe in 2020 is mainstream in 2025:
"Genocide" (applied to Israel)
"Settler colonialism"
"Apartheid"
"From the river to the sea"
"Global intifada"
This language shift changes how Americans think about:
Israel
US foreign policy
Capitalism
America's role in the world
This is the GOAL: Change consciousness to enable revolution.
PART IV: THE REVOLUTIONARY OBJECTIVE
What They Say vs. What They Mean
What They Say:
"We're fighting genocide"
"We support Palestinian human rights"
"We want peace and justice"
What They Actually Write:
From ICSGP:
"The South African Case at the World Court provides colonized peoples around the world a unique opportunity...to shift the balance of global power away from the U.S. and toward the Global South."
From Black Alliance for Peace:
"Israel and the U.S. are the most dangerous nations in the world. Their power must be dismantled."
From The People's Forum events:
"Building alternative power to challenge U.S. hegemony" "Solidarity with socialist movements worldwide"
From IPA founding documents:
"Confronting imperialism and building peoples' power"
This is not human rights language. This is revolutionary language.
The Ideological Foundation
What is "Anti-Imperialism"?
In Marxist-Leninist theory:
Imperialism = highest stage of capitalism (Lenin)
Therefore: Fighting imperialism = fighting capitalism
Primary imperialist power = United States
Therefore: Fighting US "imperialism" = fighting American capitalism
The Revolutionary Logic:
Israel is "settler colonial state" supported by US
Palestine resistance is "anti-imperialist struggle"
Supporting Palestine = opposing US imperialism
Opposing US imperialism = opposing capitalism
Therefore: Palestine activism is gateway to communist revolution
This is why organizations like:
Communist Party USA
Party for Socialism and Liberation
Democratic Socialists of America
Workers World Party
Are ALL involved in Palestine activism. It's not about Palestine. It's about revolution.
The American Target
What needs to be destroyed for communist revolution:
Classical Marxist Theory:
Capitalist economy
Bourgeois state apparatus
Cultural hegemony (ideology)
Institutions that legitimize system
Current Revolutionary Strategy:
1. ECONOMIC DISRUPTION:
BDS campaigns (attack corporate profits)
Port blockades (disrupt supply chains)
Labor strikes (demonstrate worker power)
Goal: Prove capitalism is vulnerable
2. STATE DELEGITIMIZATION:
"US supports genocide" (moral delegitimization)
International legal cases (legal delegitimization)
Expose surveillance/repression (democratic delegitimization)
Goal: Undermine belief in American institutions
3. CULTURAL HEGEMONY:
Control university discourse
Shift media narratives
Capture religious language
Redefine "justice," "freedom," "liberation"
Goal: Change how Americans think
4. INSTITUTIONAL CAPTURE:
Universities create "Palestine Studies" programs
Unions pass political resolutions
Churches adopt activist positions
Cities pass BDS ordinances
Goal: Turn institutions against the system
This is TEXTBOOK Gramscian strategy (Italian communist Antonio Gramsci): Win "war of position" by capturing cultural institutions before attempting seizure of state power.
PART V: THE FUNDING MECHANISM
How Adversaries Fund American Revolution
The Challenge: Foreign governments cannot directly fund American revolutionaries without triggering:
Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA)
Counter-intelligence investigations
Treasury sanctions
Criminal prosecution
The Solution: NGO Laundering
The Mechanism:
STEP 1: Create Distance
Chinese government → Chinese corporations
Chinese corporations → Private individuals (Singham)
Private individual → American NGO (The People's Forum)
Result: Origin obscured through layers
STEP 2: Use Tax-Exempt Status
The People's Forum is 501(c)(3)
Donations are tax-deductible
American taxpayers subsidize operation
IRS nonprofit status provides legitimacy
STEP 3: Fiscal Sponsorship
AFGJ sponsors 150 organizations
Money flows through AFGJ to sponsees
Each organization appears independent
Reality: Central funding with distributed appearance
STEP 4: Coalition Laundering
Funded organizations create "coalitions"
ICSGP has 1,504 members
Appears to be broad grassroots movement
Reality: Coordinated by funded hubs
STEP 5: Mainstream Integration
Coalitions include legitimate organizations
Universities, unions, churches provide cover
Operation appears domestic and grassroots
Foreign control hidden multiple layers deep
The Funding We CAN See
Before October 7, 2023 (Visible Funding):
Open Society Foundation (George Soros):
$250K to AFGJ
Additional amounts to other organizations
Question: Did Soros know his money would support organizations coordinating with Chinese/Russian networks?
Tides Foundation:
$286K to AFGJ
Major progressive donor
Question: Does Tides vet recipients for foreign ties?
Rockefeller Brothers Fund:
$490K to JVP (2019-2026)
Prestigious American philanthropy
Question: Does RBF know JVP coordinates with networks aligned with adversaries?
Corporate Foundations:
Movement for Black Lives received $56.4 MILLION from corporate foundations after George Floyd
Money flowed through AFGJ (7-8% commission)
AFGJ sponsors organizations in IPA network
Result: Corporate America inadvertently funded infrastructure used by foreign influence operation
The Funding We CAN'T See
After October 7, 2023:
New Venture Fund stopped funding
AFGJ de-platformed from payment processors
Samidoun sanctioned
Yet operations EXPANDED
Where is the money coming from?
Hypothesis:
1. Singham's Personal Wealth:
$400+ million fortune
Based in Shanghai
No accountability for spending
Can fund indefinitely
2. Chinese State Channels:
Belt and Road Initiative includes "people-to-people" component
Chinese corporations could fund through intermediaries
Chinese diaspora organizations
Academic/cultural exchange programs
3. Cryptocurrency:
Anonymous transactions
Cross-border without banking system
Impossible to trace
Perfect for dark funding
4. Middle Eastern Sources:
Iranian support for PFLP
Qatar funds various organizations
Gulf states fund Islamic organizations
Palestinian Authority has funds
5. The "Grassroots" Cover:
Small donations from thousands of activists
Provides appearance of organic support
Reality: Major funding hidden behind grassroots facade
The Economic Scale Required:
To coordinate 1,504 organizations across 100+ countries requires:
Communications Infrastructure:
Encrypted messaging platforms
Video conferencing
Translation services
Website hosting
Social media management
Estimated cost: $5-10 million annually
Coordination Staff:
Regional coordinators
Campaign directors
Legal advisors
Media trainers
Technology support
Estimated cost: $10-20 million annually
Events and Mobilization:
International conferences
Regional meetings
Training sessions
Travel for delegates
Materials production
Estimated cost: $15-30 million annually
Legal Defense:
Lawyers for arrested activists
Strategic litigation
International lawfare
Bail funds
Estimated cost: $5-15 million annually
Media Operations:
BreakThrough News production
Tricontinental publications
Social media campaigns
Alternative media platforms
Estimated cost: $10-25 million annually
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST: $45-100 MILLION
Question: Who has both the money AND the motive to fund this?
Answer: America's adversaries.
PART VI: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE REVOLUTION
Measuring Revolutionary Progress
Lenin's Revolutionary Stages:
Agitation and Propaganda ✓ (Complete)
Organization Building ✓ (Complete)
Mass Mobilization ✓ (In Progress)
Dual Power ← WE ARE HERE
Seizure of State Power (Not Yet Attempted)
STAGE 4: DUAL POWER
Definition: Creation of parallel institutions that compete with state power.
Historical Examples:
Soviets (workers councils) vs. Russian Provisional Government (1917)
Communist unions vs. official unions (1930s-40s globally)
Liberated zones vs. Nationalist government (Chinese Civil War)
Current American Examples:
1. PARALLEL EDUCATION:
"Palestine Studies" programs (activist training)
The People's Forum education programs
Campus activism as political training
Alternative to traditional education
2. PARALLEL LABOR:
Activist unions (ALU) vs. traditional unions
International coordination vs. domestic focus
Political demands vs. economic demands
Allegiance to global movement vs. American workers
3. PARALLEL LEGAL:
National Lawyers Guild vs. regular lawyers
International lawfare vs. domestic law
"People's law" vs. state law
Protecting activists vs. upholding order
4. PARALLEL MEDIA:
BreakThrough News vs. mainstream media
Alternative narratives vs. official narratives
Activist journalism vs. traditional journalism
Loyalty to movement vs. objectivity
5. PARALLEL GOVERNANCE:
Campus encampments with own rules
Autonomous zones during protests
Community assemblies making decisions
Rejecting state authority
The Revolutionary Implication:
These parallel structures compete with state institutions for:
Legitimacy
Resources
Loyalty
Authority
This is pre-revolutionary dual power.
The Historical Pattern: Once dual power exists, societies face choice:
State reasserts authority (counter-revolution)
Parallel structures gain power (revolution)
Russia 1917: Soviets eventually took power from Provisional Government
China 1949: Communist zones eventually conquered Nationalist government
Cuba 1959: Revolutionary movement eventually overthrew Batista
The Question: Will America's dual power structures continue to grow, or will the state reassert authority?
Current Revolutionary Indicators
What Would We See if Revolution Were Succeeding?
✓ Institutional Capture: Universities, unions, churches adopting revolutionary positions
✓ Narrative Shift: Revolutionary language becoming mainstream
✓ Youth Radicalization: Next generation adopting revolutionary ideology
✓ Economic Disruption: BDS, strikes, blockades showing system vulnerability
✓ Legal Challenges: System forced to choose between principles and order
✓ International Coordination: American revolutionaries aligned with foreign powers
✓ Dual Power: Parallel institutions competing with state
✓ State Confusion: Government unable to effectively respond
ALL OF THESE ARE PRESENT.
The Acceleration Pattern
Timeline of Revolutionary Development:
2017: IPA founded (coordination infrastructure created)
2020: Movement for Black Lives brings $56.4M through AFGJ (revolutionary funding surge)
2023: October 7 Hamas attacks, network mobilizes immediately
2024:
ICSGP formed (1,504 organizations in one week)
127 campus encampments simultaneously
International legal campaign launched
Network expands to 2,500+ organizations
2025:
Virginia AG investigating AMP for terror funding
Treasury sanctions Samidoun
Congressional investigations begin
Yet network continues operating
The Pattern: Revolutionary infrastructure growing FASTER than counter-revolutionary response.
The Warning: Every successful communist revolution followed this pattern—accelerating revolutionary activity while government failed to respond effectively.
PART VII: WHY THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM PAST THREATS
The Soviet Threat (1920s-1991)
How We Understood It:
Clear adversary (USSR)
Visible funding (CPUSA openly Moscow-directed)
Obvious ideology (communism openly promoted)
Military threat (nuclear weapons)
Government response (FBI infiltration, McCarthy hearings, HUAC)
Why We Could Fight It:
Enemy was external and obvious
Americans united against foreign communism
Legal tools used aggressively (Smith Act, HUAC)
Counter-intelligence operations
Public understood the threat
Result: Soviet Union collapsed, CPUSA marginalized
The Current Threat (2017-Present)
Why It's More Dangerous:
1. ENEMY IS OBSCURED:
Multiple adversaries (China, Russia, Iran) coordinating
Funding hidden through NGO layers
No single communist party to target
Operations appear domestic
2. IDEOLOGY IS CAMOUFLAGED:
Revolutionary goals hidden in human rights language
"Anti-imperialism" sounds like legitimate criticism
Palestine issue provides emotional cover
Americans don't recognize communist tactics
3. INSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION:
Tax-exempt status (501c3) provides legitimacy
First Amendment protects speech
Universities protect "academic freedom"
Media supports "social justice"
System protects its own enemies
4. TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE:
Social media enables instant coordination
Encrypted communications prevent surveillance
Cryptocurrency enables dark funding
Digital organization doesn't require physical infrastructure
5. CULTURAL WEAKNESS:
Americans no longer unified against communism
Schools don't teach about communist tactics
Media sympathetic to "social justice" causes
Youth have no memory of Cold War
6. LEGAL CONSTRAINTS:
Post-Watergate restrictions on domestic intelligence
FISA courts limit surveillance
Privacy laws protect communications
Civil liberties organizations defend activists
Result: Adversaries can operate INSIDE America with minimal interference.
The Strategic Asymmetry
What Adversaries Can Do:
Fund unlimited NGOs (appears as philanthropy)
Coordinate globally (appears as solidarity)
Use American infrastructure (The People's Forum)
Exploit American freedoms (First Amendment)
Hide behind American organizations
Claim persecution when investigated
What America Can Do:
Limited by law (FISA, privacy protections)
Limited by culture (defending freedoms)
Limited by complexity (too many organizations)
Limited by politics (investigations seen as persecution)
This asymmetry is INTENTIONAL.
Adversaries designed operation to exploit American weaknesses:
Openness (can't ban NGOs preemptively)
Freedom (can't restrict speech/assembly)
Diversity (coalition includes many demographics)
Idealism (Americans want to support "justice")
PART VIII: THE END GAME
What Are They Actually Trying to Achieve?
The Stated Goals (from their own documents):
International People's Assembly:
"Building a new world based on peace, social justice, and sovereignty of peoples"
Translation: Dismantling US-led international order
ICSGP:
"Shift the balance of global power away from the U.S. and toward the Global South"
Translation: End American hegemony
Black Alliance for Peace:
"Israel and the U.S. are the most dangerous nations in the world. Their power must be dismantled."
Translation: Destroy American power
The People's Forum:
"Building alternative power to challenge U.S. hegemony"
Translation: Create rival power centers
The Geopolitical Objective
China's "Community of Common Destiny":
Replace US-led order with China-centered system
Belt and Road Initiative provides infrastructure
BRICS provides alternative to Western financial system
Shanghai Cooperation provides alternative to NATO
Need cultural/ideological component to compete with Western values
This network provides that component.
The Function:
Delegitimize "rules-based international order" (US-led)
Promote "multipolar world" (China/Russia vision)
Unite "Global South" against "Global North"
Present Western values as imperialism
Make America the villain in global narrative
The Strategy:
Use Palestine to mobilize anti-Western sentiment
Build coalitions of adversaries (Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba)
Coordinate with adversary states
Create appearance of global consensus against US
Prepare for post-American world order
The Domestic Objective
For American Revolution:
Short Term (Current):
Radicalize institutions (universities, unions, churches)
Shift narratives (change consciousness)
Build infrastructure (organizations, media, legal)
Demonstrate state vulnerability (encampments, disruption)
Make revolution seem inevitable
Medium Term (5-10 years):
Campus activists graduate → enter institutions
Union activists → control labor movement
Legal activists → enter government/judiciary
Media activists → control narratives
Revolutionaries throughout society
Long Term (10-20 years):
Revolutionary generation in positions of power
Dual power institutions fully developed
Economic crisis provides opportunity
International support from adversaries
Attempt seizure of state power
This is not speculation. This is the historical pattern of every successful communist revolution.
The Crisis Scenario
How Revolutions Actually Happen:
Not through gradual reform, but through crisis that creates revolutionary opportunity:
Economic collapse
Military defeat
Political legitimacy crisis
Social breakdown
Current Vulnerabilities:
1. ECONOMIC:
$36 trillion national debt
Unsustainable entitlements
De-dollarization efforts (BRICS)
Potential financial crisis
2. MILITARY:
Recruitment crisis
Readiness concerns
Stretched commitments
Potential Taiwan crisis
3. POLITICAL:
Deep polarization
Trust in institutions collapsing
Election legitimacy questions
Governmental paralysis
4. SOCIAL:
Cultural fragmentation
Generational divides
Racial tensions
Immigration conflicts
Any of these could trigger crisis.
Revolutionary Preparation:
When crisis hits, organized forces seize opportunity
Unorganized masses confused and passive
Dual power structures ready to step in
Revolutionaries claim to have solutions
The Historical Example:
Russia 1917: WWI crisis → Bolsheviks seized power
China 1949: WWII devastation → Communists won civil war
Cuba 1959: Batista corruption → Castro took power
Each time: Crisis + Organized Revolutionaries = Revolution
The Question: Will America face crisis while revolutionary infrastructure is in place?
PART IX: WHAT CAN BE DONE
The Counter-Revolutionary Imperative
The Situation:
2,500+ organizations coordinated
Foreign adversary funding
Institutional penetration achieved
Revolutionary ideology spreading
Time is running out
The Response Must Be:
1. EXPOSE THE NETWORK
Congressional Action:
Immediate:
Expand House Ways & Means investigation beyond AMP
Investigate entire IPA network
Subpoena Singham financial records
Trace funding flows through AFGJ
Map the complete network
Targeted Investigations:
The People's Forum ($27M building funding)
BreakThrough News (foreign agent status)
ICSGP coordination (1,504 organizations)
Tricontinental Institute (foreign direction)
Required:
Public hearings with testimony
Document releases
Media coverage
Make American people aware
2. ENFORCE EXISTING LAW
Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA):
Organizations receiving foreign direction must register:
The People's Forum (Singham/China ties)
BreakThrough News (Chinese state media alignment)
Organizations coordinating with foreign entities
Failure to register = Criminal violation
Tax-Exempt Status:
IRS must investigate:
Political activity by 501(c)(3) organizations
Foreign funding of tax-exempt entities
Fiscal sponsorship as money laundering
Revoke status for violations
Terrorism Support:
Treasury must investigate:
AFGJ's continued sponsorship of Samidoun (sanctioned entity)
Material support to PFLP (through Samidoun)
Criminal prosecution for terror support
3. DEFUND THE NETWORK
Cut Off Visible Funding:
Philanthropic Sources:
Open Society, Tides, Rockefeller must be held accountable
Public pressure on foundations
Disclosure requirements for grants
Force foundations to choose: Fund revolutionaries or maintain legitimacy
Government Contracts:
Many network organizations receive federal grants
Audit all recipients for political activity
Terminate contracts for violations
Corporate Funding:
Movement for Black Lives ($56.4M) came from corporations
Public pressure on corporate donors
Cut off corporate money
Cut Off Hidden Funding:
Banking System:
AFGJ already de-platformed from some processors
Expand to all network organizations with foreign ties
Make it impossible to move money
Cryptocurrency:
Regulate crypto to prevent dark funding
Require transparency for large transactions
Close the loophole
4. PROTECT INSTITUTIONS
Universities:
Federal Action:
Condition federal funding on ending encampment tolerance
Require disclosure of foreign funding
Investigate "Palestine Studies" programs
Force universities to choose: Federal money or radical activism
State Action:
DeSantis model in Florida (abolished DEI, banned encampments)
Other states follow suit
Retake universities from radicals
Labor Unions:
Legal Action:
Unions have legal duty to represent members, not political causes
Members can sue for political use of dues
Force unions to serve workers, not revolution
Religious Institutions:
Congregational Action:
Members must organize to oppose radical leadership
Withhold donations from denominations supporting BDS
Retake churches from activists
5. COUNTER THE NARRATIVE
Tell the Truth:
About Palestine:
October 7 was genocidal terror attack
Hamas uses human shields
Palestinian leadership rejects peace
Stop letting revolutionaries control narrative
About the Network:
This is foreign influence operation
Funded by America's adversaries
Goal is destroying American power
Make Americans understand the threat
Education:
Teach about communist tactics in schools
Show how revolutions actually work
Explain current operation
Immunize next generation
Media:
Support alternative media that tells truth
Pressure mainstream media to investigate
Use social media to spread information
Win the information war
6. BUILD COUNTER-INSTITUTIONS
Conservative Institutions:
Universities (Hillsdale, etc.)
Media (Daily Wire, etc.)
Legal (Alliance Defending Freedom, etc.)
Create alternative to captured institutions
Patriotic Organizations:
Veterans groups
Police organizations
Faith communities
Business associations
Mobilize pro-American forces
Political Action:
Support candidates who understand threat
Primary those who don't
Build political power
Take back government
7. LEGAL WARFARE
Use Their Tactics:
Strategic Litigation:
Sue universities for failing to protect Jewish students
Sue unions for misusing dues
Sue organizations for fraud
Make revolution expensive
Criminal Prosecution:
Charge leaders with appropriate crimes
FARA violations
Tax fraud
Material support for terrorism
Put revolutionaries in prison, not positions of power
8. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
Allied Nations:
Share intelligence about network
Coordinate investigations
Joint sanctions
Global counter-revolutionary coalition
Pressure on Adversaries:
Sanction Chinese entities funding Singham
Expose Russian connections
Target Iranian funding flows
Make it costly for adversaries
The Ultimate Solution
The Reality: This network exists because:
America's enemies fund it
American institutions tolerate it
American law protects it
American people don't understand it
The Solution:
Expose enemy funding
Force institutions to choose sides
Use law against revolutionaries
Educate American people
The Choice: Either America fights this network, or this network transforms America.
There is no middle ground.
CONCLUSION: THE STAKES
What We're Actually Fighting
This is not about Palestine. This is not about protests. This is not about free speech.
This is about whether the United States will survive as a constitutional republic or be transformed into something else.
The Historical Precedent:
Every society that faced similar operations either:
Defeated the network (US during original Cold War)
Was conquered by it (Russia 1917, China 1949, Cuba 1959)
No society has ever ignored such a threat and survived.
The Evidence Summary
We have documented:
2,500+ organizations in coordinated network
Foreign adversary funding (China, Russia, Iran)
Institutional penetration (universities, unions, churches, media, legal)
Revolutionary ideology (communist tactics and goals)
Dual power creation (parallel institutions)
Accelerating timeline (operations expanding despite investigations)
This is not theory. This is documented fact.
The Warning
Revolutionary infrastructure is more developed now than any time since the 1930s.
The difference: Current infrastructure is MORE sophisticated, better funded, and MORE deeply embedded in institutions.
If economic/political crisis occurs while this infrastructure exists, America could face actual revolutionary situation.
The window for peaceful counter-revolution is closing.
