We did not create Sui to build a faster version of the same financial system. We created it because we believe onchain finance is still in its earliest phase, and the products that will define it have not been built yet. And the window to build them is open right now.
BTW: Here’s the link to my Substack to stay posted:
https://adeniyisui.substack.com
Innovation Is Not What You Think It Is
Most people believe innovation starts with a great idea. Someone sees what others miss, builds what nobody imagined, and the world catches up.
It is a compelling story. I used to believe it too.
But after years of working across traditional finance, crypto infrastructure, and large-scale distributed systems, I have arrived at a very different view.
New products do not emerge simply because someone imagines them. They emerge where conditions allow them to persist.
And those conditions have nothing to do with creativity.
Look at any system. Financial markets, software platforms, even physical infrastructure. Certain product types become dominant. Others stay niche and most of them disappear entirely.
That is not random. It is the system telling you what it can sustain.
Every viable product has to clear the same four gates.
It has to be economically viable. It has to be operationally sustainable. It has to be enforceable within the rules of the system. And it has to be fundable.
If any one of those conditions fails, the product struggles to survive.
Now follow that pattern over time and you will see something interesting.
Systems converge toward a small set of product types that clear all four gates reliably. Once those products prove durable, everything follows.
Capital concentrates around them. Builders cluster around them. Tooling evolves around them. Talent organizes around them.
What looks like creative convergence is really structural selection. The system is not rewarding the best ideas. It is filtering for what can survive.
This pattern is observable across asset classes, across geographies, and across technological shifts.
Whether you look at derivatives markets, payment networks, exchanges, or digital assets, dominant categories tend to form where infrastructure and incentives align.
And once you recognize that, repetition stops being surprising.
It becomes expected. And when repetition becomes expected, the real question changes.
Not “why are people building the same things?”
But “what structural conditions would need to change for new categories to emerge?”
Nothing Gets Built Until the Infrastructure Allows It
New category defining products are downstream of capability. Every time.
You can have the idea a decade early. But if the infrastructure cannot support the workload, the product will never exist.
Think about it. Nobody built a real onchain DEX on Bitcoin
Not because nobody thought of it. Because Bitcoin was never designed as a general-purpose execution environment for composable applications.
The idea was there. The system said no.
Ethereum changed that. Programmable execution became a first-class primitive. And only then could DeFi products start to exist at all.
But even with that unlock, it took years before the conditions lined up for a product like Uniswap to become a serious market primitive.
The capability came first. The product came later. Always in that order.
Now push further. When you move into products that demand high throughput and low latency, you hit a completely different ceiling.
The limiting factor is no longer what you can program. It is what the system can actually execute under load.
This is where architecture matters.
Systems that can parallelize execution when transactions do not touch the same state fundamentally expand what is practically buildable. The design space gets wider because the infrastructure got stronger. Not the other way around.
That is the simple rule.
And once a new class of product becomes technically feasible, the system runs into the next gate.
Who funds the attempt?
Capital Turns Possibility Into Reality
In every market, capital is not just fuel. It is a filter.
It selects for what is legible. It clusters around what has precedents. It prefers models that can be benchmarked, priced, and underwritten with confidence.
And honestly, that is rational behavior. If I am deploying capital, I want to understand what I am funding. I want comps. I want to see something that worked before.
But follow that logic across an entire ecosystem and you get a predictable outcome.
Even when the infrastructure is finally capable of supporting entirely new products, most funding still flows to familiar templates.
The safest thing to finance is a variation of what already worked. The hardest thing to finance is something that does not have a name yet.
We have seen this play out on every chain. The infrastructure ships and the grants open up. Then, what gets built? The same five products.
And building at the frontier is expensive in the ways that actually matter
You need runway before there is revenue. You need security budgets. You need liquidity and distribution before there is usage. You need time to iterate before the market demands certainty.
When the only ideas that get funded are the ones capital already understands, novelty becomes costly.
So many frontier ideas never reach production, not due to failure, but due to starvation.
If you want new category-defining financial products instead of repetition, this is the gap you have to close.
Products do not emerge when something is merely possible. They emerge when enough capital is willing to underwrite the risk of making it real.
And when capital does underwrite the frontier, the outcome is not just another protocol. The outcome is a reference point. A product that becomes the standard everyone else builds against.
Category-Defining Products Change Ecosystems
Think about what happened when Uniswap launched.
Before Uniswap, onchain swaps were an experiment. After Uniswap, every swap product was measured against it.
The same thing happened with Aave. Before Aave, onchain lending was a concept. After Aave, it had a reference architecture.
These products did not just acquire users. They set the rules for everyone who came after.
And when a product becomes the reference point, other builders stop trying to compete with it. They start treating it as a given.
They build on top of it. They route through it. They compose against it. The product stops being an application and starts behaving like infrastructure.
We saw this happen in real time.
Once the core DeFi primitives existed, the cost of building the next layer collapsed. Products that would have required years of foundational work could suddenly ship in months.
The hard problem underneath had already been solved by someone else.
That is how ecosystems actually expand.
Not by adding more applications to a list. But by producing primitives that make entirely new classes of applications viable for the first time.
Every primitive unlocks a generation of builders who could not have existed without it.
The question is whether the conditions exist for that to happen again.
The Moment We Are In
So here is where we are.
The design space for onchain finance is wider than it has ever been. And I am saying it because we built the infrastructure and we can see what is now possible on top of it.
Classes of financial products that were previously impractical to run fully onchain are now viable.
Not as demos or as proofs of concept. As real systems that can operate under load, at low cost, with the kind of precision that serious financial applications demand.
This is what Sui was built for.
State can be handled with precision rather than global contention. Independent workloads execute in parallel. Complex financial operations can settle atomically in a single step.
What that means in practice is simple. Products that previously required offchain compromises or hybrid workarounds can now exist natively onchain.
The same infrastructure that handles simple payments can handle institutional-grade financial products.
The range of financial behaviors the infrastructure can sustain has grown. And when the range of what can be sustained grows, the range of what can be attempted grows with it.
But a wider frontier does not fill itself.
If the design space has expanded and the foundation is stable, the remaining question is straightforward.
Who funds the attempts?
And who can make a concentrated, deliberate allocation of capital aimed at teams building what does not yet exist, with enough depth to carry them through to production?
That is what we built Moonshots to do.
Moonshots Is A Concentrated Bet On Category Formation
Moonshots is not a grant program. It is not an accelerator. It is not a seasonal batch where we take in a cohort and see what sticks.
Moonshots is intentionally shaped as a concentrated bet on category formation. It focuses on a small number of teams, deep engagement, and high conviction.
That means being extremely selective.
We are not trying to fill a pipeline. We are trying to find the teams that are attempting something structurally new and give them the depth of support that actually matters.
The whole point is to take the other side of the bet that the market will not take.
If you are building something that VCs pass on because it does not fit their existing categories, and you have the technical depth and the product clarity to actually execute, this is the program that was built for that moment.
The goal is not to fund more activity.
The goal is to increase the attempt rate of the right kind of activity. The work that looks risky before it looks obvious.
The work that expands what DeFi can express, instead of reshuffling what it already does.
What Category-Defining Looks Like In Practice
In concrete terms, we are looking for products that do at least one of the following.
Introduce a financial primitive that does not currently exist onchain.
Deliver a genuine breakthrough in capital efficiency, not a marginal improvement but a structural leap.
Bring net new capital into the ecosystem, capital that would not be onchain otherwise, because the product unlocks a user segment or asset class that existing DeFi does not serve.
Or build a consumer experience with real retention, where users come back because the product is genuinely useful, not because emissions are paying them to stay.
And the team has to match the ambition.
Domain depth matters. Shipping velocity matters. We want to see that you understand the financial system you are trying to reshape and that you have the ability to move fast without cutting corners.
But there is one more thing that separates a real Moonshot from an interesting experiment. The product has to be a real business.
Sustainability Is Mandatory
Moonshots will help you launch. It will not carry you indefinitely.
The incentives we provide are activation energy. They exist to help you acquire your first users, find your initial liquidity, and get through the phase between launch and product market fit.
That phase is where most ambitious products die, and Moonshots is designed to make it survivable.
But the endgame is not subsidized growth.
The endgame is a product that generates enough volume and revenue to stand on its own once the incentives run out.
So when you apply, show us how the product becomes a business. It does not need to be perfect on day one. But it needs to be credible.
That is also why the support we offer goes beyond capital.
This Is A Deep Partnership Model
Building at the frontier is hard enough without doing it alone. That is why Moonshots is not structured as a check and a handshake.
We do not want to be the people who clap from the sidelines after you ship.
We want to be in the work with you while the architecture is still changeable, and while decisions you make early can either unlock the future or lock you into a dead end.
So the support is intentionally practical.
You get direct collaboration with DeFi engineers who build on this infrastructure every day.
Architecture review, performance tradeoffs, integration decisions, and the boring parts that decide whether a system survives in production.
If you are moving fast, we want to help you move fast without stepping on landmines.
On top of that, every team goes through a security audit, fully covered. If you are asking users to trust a new financial primitive, the security cannot be an afterthought.
And from a go-to-market perspective, we work with teams on launch planning, milestone narratives, and ecosystem positioning so that a strong product actually reaches the people who need to see it.
The incentive structure is designed the same way.
Up to $500,000 in total support, with an initial allocation committed before launch and additional tranches tied to real onchain traction.
The goal is to de-risk the transition from building to adoption.
Some support is committed because we believe in the attempt. More is unlocked as the product proves traction in the ways that actually matter for its model.
The point is not to keep you dependent. The point is to help you cross the gap until revenue and real usage can carry the system on their own.
And if we do this right, the outcome is bigger than a handful of successful launches.
The Endgame
I started this piece with a structural argument.
Categories form where conditions allow them to persist. Feasibility has to shift first. Capital has to follow. And the products that emerge from that alignment do not just succeed individually. They change the system.
This is the bet we are making.
DeFi today captures a narrow slice of what onchain finance can be. The categories that exist are real and functional, but they represent the products that were viable under the previous set of constraints.
They are not the ceiling. They are the floor.
What sits above that floor is a set of financial behaviors that the industry has not built yet.
If Moonshots works, the result is not ten successful products. The result is an ecosystem where the range of what gets built permanently widens.
Where new defaults form. Where builders who arrive two years from now find primitives and categories that do not exist today, and build things on top of them that we cannot currently imagine.
And if those products get built here, Sui becomes the chain where the next generation of financial categories was born.
Not the chain that ran them faster. The chain that made them possible
That is the outcome we’re engineering for.
If You Can Execute, This Is Your Moment
If you have read this far, you already know whether this is for you.
You have an idea that does not fit into any existing category. You have been told it is too risky, too early, or too hard to underwrite. And you are still working on it because you know the infrastructure can finally support what you are trying to build.
We are not looking for teams that need convincing. We are looking for teams that have the domain depth, the product clarity, and the shipping velocity to actually execute on something structurally new.
Moonshots exists to take the other side of the bet that the market will not take. If that is the bet you are making, we should be talking.
Apply to Moonshots: https://tally.so/r/MeRKJX?ref=blog.sui.io
Don't miss out on the next article!
Stay updated by subscribing to my Substack here:
https://adeniyisui.substack.com/
