Written by @13300RPM
Key Takeaways
Aerodrome generates $85–98M/year in organic fees with 100% flowing to veAERO lockers, making it one of the few DeFi protocols where token value accrual is direct and verifiable across 128 epochs.
Coinbase's involvement goes beyond investment: $20M bought, active governance participation, cbBTC liquidity steering, and Coinbase One integration make this a de facto strategic relationship.
At $0.30 (4–5x dilution-adjusted P/E on trough volume), a return to 2025 average Base DEX volume implies 1.6–1.9x with no multiple expansion needed.
Though AERO-denominated emissions mean dilution scales linearly with price, eating 38% of revenue at 5x P/E and 55% at 10x, which caps upside unless volume growth outpaces price appreciation.
Even when BASE launches, AERO is still the better trade.
Join the Four Pillars Telegram group to get the latest crypto insights:
https://t.me/FourPillarsGlobal
You can see the full article in the link below:
https://4pillars.io/en/articles/aero-thesis-base-s-cash-cow-coinbase-s-golden-child
1. Introduction
On February 11, BlackRock's BUIDL started trading on Uniswap. The world's largest asset manager is now routing tokenized Treasuries through a DEX, and if that doesn't make you rethink how you value onchain exchanges, I don't know what to tell you.
Aerodrome is doing $85–98M a year in swap fees, all of it flowing directly to lockers, trading at a 4–5x dilution-adjusted P/E on the largest L2 by TVL. I think the disconnect between what this protocol earns and what the market pays for it is the widest mispricing in spot DEXs right now.
The Coinbase relationship goes deeper than anything published; $20M market-bought, active veAERO governance steering cbBTC liquidity, feeless trading through Coinbase One.
Base doesn't have a token, yet. Yesterday Base announced it's leaving the OP Stack for its own unified stack, with "Base-specific governance" and "Economic Changes" on the V3 roadmap.
Read between the lines. BASE is coming. And when it does, I'd still buy AERO over BASE. A stupid corporate L2 governance token with no cash flows doesn't replace the DEX that every $BASE pair will trade through. Needless to say the launch itself may be Aerodrome's biggest volume catalyst.
2. The Business
2.1 ve(3,3) DEX
Three groups use Aerodrome and each one gets paid differently. Traders swap tokens and pay fees — roughly 6.2 basis points on concentrated liquidity pools (Slipstream), which now handle 97–98% of all volume. Liquidity providers deposit capital into those pools and earn AERO emissions as compensation, directed weekly by governance votes. And then there are veAERO holders — people who locked their AERO tokens (up to 4 years, average lock duration is 3.7 years) and in return receive 100% of the trading fees generated by the pools they vote for.
On top of this sits a bribe layer: protocols pay veAERO holders to direct emissions toward specific pools, effectively creating a marketplace for liquidity allocation. Lock your tokens, vote where emissions go, collect fees and bribes from the pools you voted for.
Source: Aerodrome Finance docs
2.2 Design vs. Uniswap / Curve
The fee routing is the design choice that separates Aerodrome from everything else. Uniswap activated its fee switch in December 2025, routing protocol fees into a buyback-and-burn mechanism running at roughly $26M/year against a $3 billion market cap. Curve splits fees between LPs and veCRV holders, but the split dilutes both sides as emissions decay.
Aerodrome takes a different path: LPs get emissions, voters get fees directly. Both approaches accrue value to holders, but the mechanism is different. Buyback-and-burn reduces supply over time; direct distribution puts $1.6M a week in trading fees into veAERO holders' wallets. The tradeoff is that Aerodrome's model requires active participation (locking, voting) while Uniswap's is passive.
2.3 Rebase and the Aero Fed
The critical mechanic most people miss is the rebase. Every epoch, the protocol mints new AERO (currently about 4.28M tokens per week). But not all of that goes to LPs. The protocol calculates what share of total AERO supply is locked as veAERO and returns that proportion of new emissions back to lockers. Here's how that breaks down at Epoch 128:
The net result is that veAERO holders get partially compensated for inflation (their voting power and ownership share decay much slower than the headline supply growth suggests). This is a meaningful reason why 50% of all AERO is locked and 40,880 wallets hold veAERO positions.
Since Epoch 67, emission rates are no longer hardcoded. The Aero Fed system gives veAERO voters direct control over monetary policy: each epoch they vote to increase, decrease, or hold emissions flat by 0.01% of total supply, bounded between 0.52% and 52% annualized. Voters aggressively cut emissions from 6.6M to 4.3M AERO/week between Epochs 102 and 112, then stabilized around 4.2M for the last 15 epochs. This isn't automatic decay; rather, it's stakeholders who earn from the system actively managing the supply schedule, and they found an equilibrium because they're optimizing for the system to keep working.
3. Financial Analysis
The question every ve-model DEX eventually has to answer is whether it's a real business or a subsidy machine (a farm), whether the fees it generates from actual trading activity can justify the token inflation it pays to attract liquidity. For most of Aerodrome's life, the answer was clearly subsidy machine. For the first 60 epochs, the protocol was paying 5-10x more in emission costs than it earned in fees.
That changed. As Base trading volume grew independently and Aero Fed governance aggressively cut emissions (6.6M to 4.3M AERO/week between Epochs 102 and 112), the two lines converged from opposite directions until they crossed at Epoch 113, the first time fee revenue matched emission costs. By Epoch 128, fees alone are 1.35x total LP emissions, and the crossover has held for 15 consecutive epochs.
The obvious pushback is bribes. Weekly bribe revenue dropped 91%, and the bear case says this proves the flywheel is broken (price falls, bribes dry up, revenue collapses). But look at what actually happened to the rest of the business when bribes disappeared:
The bribe market dried up because protocols are literally losing money at current prices; $1 in bribes directs less than $0.82 in emission value, which is what rational actors do. But the protocol didn't fall apart because it was never dependent on bribes to sustain itself. Swap fees declined 40%, driven by lower Base volume, not bribe dependency. Bribes are better understood as cyclical upside that reactivates when AERO price rises (higher price → higher emission value → better bribe ROI → protocols re-enter) rather than the foundation.
The next test is whether liquidity survives without the subsidy. If Aerodrome is really just a farm, LPs should be entirely dependent on emissions. But Slipstream LPs at Epoch 128 tell the opposite story:
Strip emissions to zero and LPs still earn 45.7%, which is higher than virtually any other organic DeFi yield source(This assumes current TVL; emissions partially support LP deposits, so some marginal capital would leave without them. But $224M in Slipstream TVL turning over at 834x annualized means remaining LPs would likely see higher organic APR, not lower.) These aren't mercenary farmers chasing printed tokens. They're earning real yield from real activity. People seem to know this, because the conviction signal during the drawdown is pretty striking:
The token lost 70% of its value and 14,000 new wallets locked veAERO positions. The top holders are protocols like Moonwell (#1 at 11.5M veAERO), Inverse Finance, KlimaDAO, and Reserve Protocol who are entities locking to secure liquidity infrastructure for their own operations. Half of all AERO ever created sits in multi-year lockups and that ratio hasn't budged through an 87% drawdown.
So the business generates $85-98M in organic fees, LPs are profitable without subsidies, holders are locking through the worst of the drawdown, and bribes are 8% of revenue. That's not the thesis (if "it doesn't die" is your thesis you need a better thesis), but it's the foundation everything else sits on. The question now is whether the catalysts exist to make this business worth more and what that price looks like.
4. The Catalysts
4.1 Coinbase’s Golden Child
Coinbase Ventures market-bought approximately $20M in AERO, reportedly the largest liquid token investment Coinbase Ventures has ever made. They locked a significant portion as veAERO and actively participate in governance, directing emissions toward cbBTC and cbETH pools. (Coinbase doesn't show up as a labeled entity in the Dune veAERO holder list, which likely means their position is spread across unlabeled wallets rather than held under a single tagged address.) When cbBTC launched in September 2024, Coinbase shifted its veAERO voting power to bootstrap the new trading pair, and Aerodrome captured 78% of all cbBTC trading volume from day one.
It goes deeper than the investment. Base has no native token yet, so AERO functions as the de facto ecosystem incentive token meaning the Base Ecosystem Fund distributes AERO to bootstrap new projects. Coinbase One subscribers get feeless trading on Aerodrome specifically. The Coinbase app integrates Aerodrome directly, exposing it to 100M+ users.
On February 18, Base announced it's leaving the OP Stack for its own unified stack, with "Base-specific governance" and "Economic Changes" on the V3 roadmap. I wrote about this exact scenario a month ago (Base generating 71% of Superchain revenue while paying 2.5% back, the MIT-licensed exit option, $BASE as the leverage to formalize independence). Yesterday's announcement confirmed the exit, and now the token follows.
If $BASE launches, it doesn't kill the AERO thesis; rather, it's probably the single biggest volume catalyst Aerodrome could ask for. Every L2 token launch (ARB, OP) drove massive onchain activity. $BASE/ETH and $BASE/USDC become top pairs overnight, routed through whoever has the deepest liquidity and governance alignment. That's Aerodrome. What AERO loses in narrative (\the only way to be long Base) it gains massively in actual volume.
Base is the largest L2 by DeFi TVL ($3.9B), bigger than Arbitrum, bigger than every L2 that was supposed to win the rollup war. Volume is off 74% from its October ATH, but this is is market-wide decline, not Base-specific weakness. And Aerodrome is the dominant DEX on the most capitalized L2 in crypto.
4.2 Institutional DeFi Convergence
On February 11, 2026, BlackRock's BUIDL fund (largest tokenized money market fund at over $1.7B AUM) began trading on Uniswap via Securitize, with BlackRock making a strategic investment in the Uniswap ecosystem alongside the launch. First time a major institutional asset manager has routed a flagship tokenized product through a DEX rather than traditional rails. If institutional RWAs, tokenized securities, and institutional FX trade onchain, they route through spot DEXs. This means the TAM for spot DEX trading just expanded exponentially from retail DeFi swaps to potentially all tokenized financial assets.
Aerodrome doesn't need to win the BUIDL business specifically. It needs the category to grow, and it's positioned as Base's version of exactly the infrastructure that BlackRock just validated on Ethereum mainnet.
Coinbase is an investor in Circle and the primary distribution partner for USDC. Circle is launching Arc, a permissioned blockchain, and Aero (the merged Aerodrome/Velodrome entity) is expanding to Arc in Q2 2026. If institutional capital flows into tokenized assets on Coinbase-adjacent infrastructure (both Base and Circle's Arc) the liquidity routes through whichever DEX has the deepest pools and the governance alignment.
Sidenote: Dromos Labs is merging Aerodrome and Velodrome (Optimism) into Aero in Q2 2026, with AERO holders getting 94.5% of the new token supply. Expansion to Ethereum mainnet, Circle's Arc, embedded MEV auctions, cross-chain swaps. Sounds big on paper. Velodrome did $8.77M in revenue in 2025 with -$19M in earnings which is a rounding error on Aerodrome's business. The real value is narrower: it hedges single-chain dependency and AERO holders aren't diluted for it. Not nothing, not the catalyst the team is selling either.
5. Valuation & Sensitivity Analysis
Aerodrome generates $85–98M in 30d annualized revenue flowing directly to veAERO holders against a $268M market cap. That's a 2.7–3.1x P/S, which would make it the cheapest revenue-generating DEX token in crypto if you could just stop there. You can't, because the protocol emits ~4.28M AERO per week (~223M annually per epoch 128), of which 46% is rebased to lockers. Net dilution hitting the market runs ~108M AERO annually; $31M at $0.29, scaling linearly with price. That gives dilution-adjusted earnings of $54–67M and a locker-perspective P/E of 4.0–5.0x at current prices.
So you get three different P/E readings depending on how honest you want to be about the rebase:
Gross P/S ignoring dilution entirely: 2.7–3.1x.
Conservative system-level (charging lockers for all gauge emissions without rebase credit): 6.7–9.9x.
The locker-perspective number that nets out the rebase they actually receive: 4.2–5.3x
I think the locker number is the right one for someone evaluating AERO as an investment since you have to lock to earn the fees, and if you're locked, the rebase is real money.
Revenue = Base DEX volume × Aerodrome share × fee rate. Fee rate has stabilized at 6.1~6.3 bps post-Slipstream. Aerodrome currently holds ~47% of Base DEX volume ($412M out of $878M daily), Uniswap 29%, PancakeSwap 20%.
Base weekly DEX volume peaked at $14.5B (October 2025), averaged $7.9B across 2025, and currently sits at $3.8–6.8B depending on lookback (last week vs. 13-week average). TVL is up-only ($3.9B, largest L2) but volume follows market activity. Five scenarios all anchored to historical data per defillama:
Bear: volume stays at current trough ($3.8B/wk), share compresses to 40% as V4 hooks mature. Revenue: ~$50M. Everything goes wrong and nothing from Section IV materializes.
Current: volume at trailing implied run rate ($5.5B/wk), share holds at 47%. Revenue: ~$85M. The business as it exists today.
Base: volume recovers to the 2025 full-year average ($7.9B/wk), share dips to 44%. Revenue: ~$113M. Base returns to normal throughput, V4 takes some share.
Bull: volume returns to ATH territory ($14.5B/wk, October 2025), share holds at 47% on Coinbase alignment deepening and institutional DeFi adoption. Revenue: ~$223M. This has happened before; Q3 2025 averaged $9.4B/wk and the top week hit $14.5B.
Moon: volume hits 2x ATH ($29B/wk), share expands to 50% as bribe market reactivates at higher prices and BUIDL/cbBTC integration pulls institutional volume through Aerodrome. Revenue: ~$474M. Requires a new cycle and every catalyst from Section 4 firing simultaneously.
Because emissions are AERO-denominated, dilution cost scales with price. A higher multiple means paying more + dilution eats a larger fixed percentage of revenue at equilibrium (38% at 5x, 55% at 10x, 64% at 15x regardless of the scenario). The matrix below solves for the mcap where implied AERO price produces dilution cost consistent with the P/E being paid:
(parenthetical = multiple from current $268M mcap; bolded cell ≈ current state)
6. Risks
6.1 Reflexivity
Emissions are AERO-denominated, not dollar-denominated — dilution cost scales with price while revenue scales with volume. This means price appreciation without proportional volume growth mechanically worsens the fundamentals:
At $0.30 current volume you're buying real excess earnings at 4–5x. At $0.50 flat volume it stretches to 10–16x. At $1.00 flat volume dilution exceeds revenue entirely. At $1.00 with 2x volume it works again but you're paying 10–16x for a business that needs to double its throughput to justify the price. The Section 5 matrix makes this concrete: the bull case ($14.5B/wk ATH volume) at 10x P/E puts AERO at $1.13 where dilution eats 55% of gross revenue, and the equilibrium mcap is $1.0B rather than the $2.2B you'd get if dilution were flat.
The natural pushback is that bribes come back at higher prices — higher AERO price means higher emission value means better bribe ROI, so protocols re-enter the bribe market and add incremental revenue and the ve model reactivates. That's true, and the flat-volume rows above overstate the damage by assuming bribes stay at 8% of revenue even when bribe ROI improves. But dilution grows on the full emission base while bribes are incremental on top — even with bribe reactivation, the P/E worsens at higher prices unless volume scales proportionally. The bribe recovery cushions the fall, it doesn't prevent it.
The ve-model is self-sustaining at low prices and re-breaks at high prices. The business proved itself over 128 epochs at the worst possible price for the model, but "it works at $0.30" is not the same as "it works at $1.00," and anyone buying for a 3x needs to grapple with that. The bull case requires volume growth, bribe reactivation, or continued Aero Fed emission cuts.
6.2 Perpetual, Unpredictable Inflation
The Aero Fed adds a governance layer on top. Voters can set emissions anywhere between 0.52% and 52% annualized. The current ~4.2M/week equilibrium has held for 15 epochs, but it's a political equilibrium, not a mechanical one. The top veAERO holders are protocols (Moonwell, Inverse Finance, KlimaDAO, Reserve) who lock to secure liquidity for their own operations. They're optimizing for emission yields on their pools, not for AERO price appreciation. The top 5 holders already control a disproportionate share of voting power, and their interests are aligned with AERO holders only incidentally (what they actually want is cheap liquidity for their own tokens).
So if the incentive math shifts, say a new protocol accumulates enough veAERO to push for higher emissions to juice its own pool, the equilibrium breaks and there's no backstop. The alignment between voters and price-sensitive holders is coincidental right now.
6.3 Fee Compression
Average fee rate dropped from 10.68 bps at Epoch 75 to ~6.2 bps at Epoch 128 — a 42% decline driven by Slipstream concentrated liquidity pools replacing legacy V2 pools. Slipstream is dramatically more capital efficient (which is why LPs earn 45.7% organic APR), but that efficiency means each dollar of volume generates less fee revenue. Revenue = volume × fee rate, and if fee rate compresses faster than volume grows, revenue shrinks even with stable or growing activity.
Slipstream now handles 98% of volume, which means the V2→CL migration is essentially complete and further compression from pool-type shift is limited. Recent epochs show the fee rate stabilizing in a 6.1–6.3 bps range. Uniswap V4 with hooks has been live on Base since January 2025 (singleton contract, 99% cheaper pool deployment, custom fee logic) and hasn't dented Aerodrome's share in a year. That's a real data point about the veAERO governance moat.
But the hooks ecosystem is still early, and if V4 hooks mature enough to pull liquidity with more competitive fee structures, fee rates across Base DEXs could compress, dropping run-rate revenue even at current volume levels. Still above dilution cost at $0.30, but the margin of safety gets thin.
All three risks compound in the same direction. The bull and moon cases from Section V require price appreciation, price appreciation mechanically increases dilution cost, the governance structure has no hard cap on that dilution, and fee compression is slowly eroding the revenue line everything else sits on. None of these are death sentences at current prices — the $85–98M revenue base with 92% organic share is genuinely robust. But the base case only gets you 1.6–1.9x, and anything beyond that requires volume recovery to 2025 averages or above with the dilution tax taking an increasingly large bite on the way up.
7. Conclusion
A bet on AERO is a bet on Coinbase and Base. Base doesn't have a token (yet), which means AERO is essentially the only rational way to be long the most capitalized L2 in crypto. And as I mentioned in the intro, even if a BASE token existed tomorrow, I'd rather buy the DEX doing $85–98M in real fee revenue with direct value accrual to lockers than a L2 governance token with no cash flows and a pitch deck about "ecosystem alignment."
Moreover, the irony is that a $BASE launch probably makes AERO more valuable, not less; every L2 token launch floods the chain with activity, and that activity routes through the dominant DEX.
Ultimately, the math at current prices is hard to argue with. You're getting 4~5x dilution adjusted P/E on trough-adjacent volume, and the base case (volume recovering to its own 2025 average, nothing heroic) gets you 1.6–1.9x. The bull case at ATH volume implies 3–4x. Everything above that requires a new cycle and every Section 4 catalyst firing, with the reflexivity tax eating more of the upside the higher price goes.
Related People, Projects :
@AerodromeFi
@base
@coinbase
You can see the full article in the link below:
https://4pillars.io/en/articles/aero-thesis-base-s-cash-cow-coinbase-s-golden-child
Disclaimer:
The author of this report may have personal holdings or financial interests in assets or tokens discussed herein. However, the author affirms that no transactions have conducted using material non-public information obtained in the course of research or drafting. This report is intended solely for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, business, investment, or tax advice. It should not be used as a basis for making any investment decisions or as guidance for accounting, legal, or tax matters. Any references to specific assets or securities are made for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to invest. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and may not reflect the views of any affiliated institutions, organizations, or individuals. The opinions and analyses expressed herein are subject to change without prior notice. In addition, beyond the individual disclosures included in each report, Four Pillars, may hold existing or prospective investments in some of the assets or protocols discussed herein. Furthermore, FP Validated, a division of Four Pillars, may already be operating as a node in certain networks or protocols discussed herein or may do so in the future. Please see here for FP Validated’s participating network disclosures and here for broader disclosure details.
